ހުއްދަދިނުމާއި ވޯކްފްލޯ
ނާޒުކު ކޮންމެ ޢަމަލެއް ފެންނަނީ ރަނގަޅު ލޯތަކަށް — އަމިއްލައަށް
Salary increments, leave, loans, advances, holds and HR cases all flow through one approval engine. Routes resolve approvers by role, designation, reporting line or amount — and every decision is recorded, permanently. And when something goes wrong on site, formal investigations and disciplinary cases run through the same recorded machinery, from witness statement to final letter.
See it live — demo in minutes →Sound familiar?
Approvals happen in chat messages that vanish
Big-amount decisions signed off by whoever was available
Disciplinary actions inconsistent across departments
No way to prove who approved what, months later
Capabilities
What you get
10 capabilities
One engine, many workflows
Six-plus request types — increments, leave, encashment, loans, advances, holds — share the same routing engine and audit trail.
Smart approver resolution
Route steps to a role, a designation, a specific person, or 'the requester's manager' via the reporting line.
Amount-based routing
Bigger amounts climb higher: routing bands send large requests to senior approvers automatically.
Snapshot at submission
Routes are frozen when a request is submitted, so changing a route never disturbs requests already in flight.
Disciplinary case management
A formal measure ladder from counselling to termination, with letters, acknowledgments, appeals and immutable snapshots.
Incident investigations
Record an incident, collect the facts and close with a documented outcome — every case has a full lifecycle: submit, withdraw, reopen, close.
Signed witness statements
Statements are taken in the app and signed — or formally refused — by the person who gave them, so what was said is never disputed later.
Investigation-to-discipline hand-off
When an investigation warrants action, it escalates into a formal disciplinary case in one step, carrying its statements and evidence with it.
Escalation
Stale approvals escalate automatically so requests never rot in an absent approver's queue.
In-app notifications
Approvers see pending work on the notification bell with unread counts — decisions don't wait in an inbox.
Straight from the product
Real screens from the demo company — the same system your login opens.
Works best with
ދެ ފައިސާއިން ހިނގާ ޕޭރޯލް
MVR އާއި USD، ރަމަޟާން ރަންތައް، ލޯނާއި ހޯލްޑް — ހާސްކަމެއް ނެތް މުސާރަ ދުވަހެއް
Explore →ޗުއްޓީ މެނޭޖްކުރުން
އަމިއްލައަށް ހިސާބުކުރެވޭ ބެލެންސް — ލޯކަލް ޤަވާޢިދުތަކާ އެކު
Explore →ސިޓީއާއި އިލެކްޓްރޯނިކް ސޮއި
ތިޔަ ބޭފުޅުންގެ ލެޓަރހެޑްގައި ނެރެ، ބަދަލުނުކުރެވޭ ގޮތަށް ފައިލްކޮށް، ދެން ސޮއިކުރުވާށެވެ
Explore →މުވައްޒަފުންގެ ރެކޯޑާއި ކޮމްޕްލަޔަންސް
ކޮންމެ މުވައްޒަފެއް، ކޮންމެ ލިޔުމެއް، މުއްދަތު ހަމަވާ ކޮންމެ ތާރީޚެއް — އެއް މަޞްދަރެއްގައި
Explore →Questions
Can different request types have different routes?
Yes — each request type has its own route, and amount bands within it can route to different approvers.
What happens if an approver leaves?
Routes resolve by role or designation, so the seat matters, not the person — and in-flight requests can be escalated.
Can we run a formal investigation before deciding on action?
Yes — record the incident, collect signed (or formally refused) witness statements, and close with a documented outcome. If action is warranted, the investigation escalates into a disciplinary case carrying its evidence with it.
ތިޔަބޭފުޅުންގެ ޑޭޓާއާ އެއްގޮތް ޑޭޓާއަކުން އަމިއްލައަށް ބައްލަވާ
ޑެމޯއަކަށް އެދިވަޑައިގަތުމުން، ފުރިހަމައަށް ޑޭޓާ އަޅާފައިވާ ޑެމޯ ކުންފުންޏަކަށް ވަދެވޭ އަމިއްލަ ލޮގިން އީމެއިލުން ފޮނުވައިދޭނަމެވެ — މިނެޓްކޮޅެއްގެ ތެރޭގައި ޙަޤީޤީ ސްކްރީންތައް، ޙަޤީޤަތާ އެއްގޮތް ޑޭޓާއާއެކު ބައްލަވާލެވޭނެއެވެ.
ކްރެޑިޓް ކާޑެއް ބޭނުމެއް ނުވޭ. ސޭލްސް ކޯލެއް ވެސް ނުޖެހޭ. ޙަޤީޤީ ލޮގިންއެއް، އީމެއިލުން ފޮނުވައިދެނީ.





